Beyond the vacancy: How banks can plan talent around capability
A hiring plan can tell you how many roles a bank expects to fill. However, at most instances, it does not necessarily inform the business key details such as when the capability is required and when the work begins.
The gap will become apparent when we look into other priorities such as a regulatory deadline, a data platform build or a financial crime remediation program. The roles matter, but so does have the right skills and enough capacity at the point the work needs to happen.
What a vacancy will inform the business is the roles needed to be hired, while capability asks questions involving the business: what does the business need to be able to do, and what combination of skills, experience and capacity will get it there?
Why capability is becoming a more useful measure
For recruitment and hiring, the standard metrics of time-to-fill and quality-of-hire will remain useful as part of filling in vacancies. However, as a business continues to grow, HR and TA leaders are also considering expanding that measurement to include capability. These measurements would include the skills the business line needs to be in place when the work starts, and can they keep pace if the requirement changes?
Everest Group’s Operationalizing Next-Generation Talent Acquisition research reflects that shift. 46% of respondents mentioned strengthened strategic workforce planning aligned to future skill needs as an expected TA outcome.
Having TA teams build an understanding of what is available and what are the gaps, helps them to contribute even before the first requisition is opened. Identifying where the risks are, the technology and data skills required, how long will they take to hire, and the cost are some key considerations that will shape the hiring approach before the recruitment process begins. It means workforce decisions can be informed by what the market can realistically support, rather than discovering those constraints later.
Designing the workforce mix around the work
Permanent, early-career and contingent hiring often sit with different owners and different reporting lines. That can make a simple question hard to answer: what combination of people will deliver this program? A more useful starting point is the work itself. A remediation program with a fixed window may call for specialist contractors and a delivery partner alongside a small permanent core. A data platform that will run for years may justify more permanent investment, with an early-career pipeline behind it.
Once the mix is visible in one place, decisions are easier to explain. Finance can see the cost of each route, risk and compliance can see where responsibilities sit, and the business can see how quickly it can scale up or down if scope changes. It also gives TA a clearer view of the total workforce being assembled around a business priority, rather than only the vacancies being filled.
Where a delivery partner fits
A delivery partner can form part of the workforce mix, particularly where a bank needs specialist capability quickly, has a defined program of work or wants to flex capacity without building it permanently. The role of the partner can range from providing specialist talent to taking responsibility for agreed elements of delivery.
Everest Group reports that 67% of respondents expect KPIs to align to enterprise goals. That matters because the measures used with an external partner should make sense to the business too. At Robert Walters, we work with clients to understand those priorities first, then co-create an approach around how the organization operates and the outcomes it actually wants to see.
Choosing measures the business recognizes
Fill rates tell you how many seats were occupied. They say less about whether the team was ready to deliver. Time-to-capability is one measure worth considering. Put simply, how long does it take to get the right skills in place and for the team to become productive?
Everest Group includes time-to-capability among the north-star outcomes TA can work towards, alongside workforce agility, hiring quality aligned to growth and talent cost effectiveness.
A practical place to start is agreeing what a productive team should look like before the program begins, and when the business expects to get there. Progress can then be reviewed against that point whether the people involved are permanent, contracted or supplied by a partner. Specialist talent may also have several options in the market. A slow or unclear hiring process can therefore become a delivery issue, not simply a candidate-experience issue.

Keeping decision rights clear as automation grows
As AI and automation are being used across the hiring process within banking, there are some emerging questions: who, or what, is making each decision?
To begin, identifying and mapping where automation is currently required or being used will be key in understanding the opportunities and gaps. With that information, business leaders will be able to decide who will be accountable for the use of AI within the business and where human judgement is still necessary. Building a strong governance process will be key in maintaining the use of AI that is secure, and productive.
Moreover, it also makes those decisions easier to explain. That matters particularly where AI or automation influences hiring decisions, and banks may need to show risk, audit and governance stakeholders how the process works and where accountability remains with people.
What this means for leaders
There are a few useful questions to bring into the next workforce planning conversation.
- Which two or three outcomes would the business recognize as success for TA, such as quality-of-hire, time-to-capability or workforce agility?
- How clear is the full workforce mix across permanent, early-career and contingent hiring for your largest programs?
- Where do partners already contribute to outcomes, and are their KPIs tied to enterprise goals?
- Where AI or automation is involved, who makes the decision and who remains accountable?
Talk through your workforce priorities
If these questions reflect priorities in your business, we'd be happy to discuss what a capability-led approach could look like for your workforce. Speak with our talent solutions expert to explore how we can help you build the right capability around your business priorities.
Meet our expert RPO team
Chris Eldridge
CEO, North America
With over three decades of experience in professional services recruitment, half of which has been spent in leadership positions, Chris brings deep expertise in North American, UK, European and Asian hiring markets. As CEO, he has driven innovative strategies that have shaped recruitment practices globally. His insights into talent acquisition trends and leadership development make him a sought-after commentator on workforce evolution.
Dawn Sloan
Operations Director, North America
Dawn oversees operational delivery, governance, and performance for our North America client portfolio, driven by a passion for customer experience, innovation, and continuous improvement.
FAQs
-
What does "capability, not candidates" mean for banking talent acquisition?
It means looking beyond how many candidates were presented or vacancies filled and asking whether the bank has the skills it needs for the work ahead. A regulatory deadline, platform build or remediation program each creates a different capability requirement. Permanent hiring, contractors, early-career programs and delivery partners are different ways of meeting it. Everest Group’s research reflects that direction, with 46% of respondents citing strengthened strategic workforce planning aligned to future skill needs as an expected TA outcome. -
How can banks measure whether hiring is delivering capability?
Start with what the business needs the team to be able to do. Fill rates and quality-of-hire still matter, but time-to-capability can sit alongside them. How long does it take to get the necessary skills in place and for the team to become genuinely productive? One practical approach is to agree with that point with the business before a program starts. Progress can then be reviewed against whether the workforce includes permanent employees, contractors, or partner-delivered resources. -
How should banks decide between permanent, contract, and partner-delivered resources?
Start with the work rather than the hiring route. How long will the capability be needed? How scarce is the skill? How quickly does the team need to be productive? And how likely is the requirement to change? A fixed window program may suit specialist contractors or a delivery partner alongside a permanent core. A platform the bank expects to run for years may justify more permanent investment. Looking at the options together gives finance, risk, and business leaders a clearer comparison of cost, responsibility, and flexibility. -
What role can a talent solutions provider play in delivering outcomes?
A talent solutions provider can contribute beyond sourcing where it is involved early enough in the planning. That might include sharing market intelligence on specialist skills, helping shape the workforce mix, or taking responsibility for agreed elements of delivery. Everest Group reports that 67% of respondents expect KPIs to align to enterprise goals. For Robert Walters, that means working with clients to understand what the business is trying to achieve first, then agreeing the level of support and measures that make sense for that organization. -
How should banks govern AI and automation in hiring?
Where AI or automation influences hiring decisions, banks may need a clear record of how those decisions are made and who remains accountable. A practical starting point is to map the process from role definition through to offer, note where AI or automation is used and identify the person responsible at each decision point. That gives TA, business, risk and governance teams a shared view of the process and makes it easier to explain how technology is being used as adoption grows.
Related content
View AllRobert Walters worked with a leading European bank to overcome their challenge to recruit for their anti-financial crime department. They were faced with a combination of attrition and regulatory headcount requirements. The company’s strategic shift to trialing a remote working pilot as a result of
Read MoreCandidate experience is fast becoming the key to gaining the competitive edge in the talent marketplace. In recent years, customer experience has become a key focus among businesses, with almost half of business leaders viewing it as a top priority for the next 5 years. There is no doubt that consum
Read MoreWelcome to the world of nurture. Marketers have been using it for years to communicate with interested leads, influence the buyer’s journey and convert them into customers. Why should the candidate experience be any different? Robert Walters' Candidate Experience in the Expectation Economy research
Read More